05:30 - 06:30: Obj.2.1c (7/26)
Okay... so, this was setup, but still I need to point out a concern.
There's 40 minutes of audio, and I only got through 5 minutes in the first hour.
That means audio is going to take 8 hours.
I don't HAVE 8 hours to spend on audio. It needs to be done in 4.
So we're going to have to really pick up the pace on the next one.
Showing posts with label audio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label audio. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 7, 2018
Wednesday, January 31, 2018
CDC 5 Day 18
5p - ...
So... what to do, what to do....
Guess it's time to get started
05:30 - 06:30: Obj.2.1c (1/25)
Also, a treat from Ed Dale that I will almost inevitably use soon:
So... what to do, what to do....
Guess it's time to get started
05:30 - 06:30: Obj.2.1c (1/25)
Also, a treat from Ed Dale that I will almost inevitably use soon:
GAMECHANGER ALERT
You know I only use GAMECHANGER rarely.
I'm calling it on this new software for transcription and editing audio.
It use google AI and frankly freaking voodoo to alloe you to edit video BY EDITING TEXT
This should not be possible.
I've been testing it for the last few hours and THIS IS MAGIC.
It's MAC for now and Windows in the next couple of days.
I just fed it the audio of my latest stream and it transcribed WITH PUNCTUATION - INCLUDED WORDS I SHOULD HAVE SAID - ADDED PARAGRAPHS
Now of course it's not perfect BUT it's bloody good - and that's just for transcripts
Then you can cut an paste your AUDIO - WITH TEXT
Go to descript.com right now and see this voodoo for yourself.
Try it now - Seriously
Ed
Labels:
audio,
descript,
ed dale,
editing,
text editing,
video,
voice to text
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Q1 CDC Day 39
5p - 6:30p
05:15 - 06:15: Obj.1.2c2 (1/4)
Recorded first run of new video script with comforter sound dampener test.
We'll see how it sounds... whenever the lap top decides to stop... whatever the hell it's doing that's consuming all the goddamn resources. God dammit, microsoft, wtf did you do with Windows 10. Leave the computer alone I'm trying to work and whatever you're doing is obviously way over the top.
FYI went 78 on audio level and talked waaay to loud so it's probably going to be garbage.
ONE UPPING AND AUDIO RECORDING:
The way to 1-up is to dump everything you have into every line you read.
When reading for extended periods of time you tend to slip into "reading out loud" mode instead of "excited, energetic conversation" mode.
05:15 - 06:15: Obj.1.2c2 (1/4)
Recorded first run of new video script with comforter sound dampener test.
We'll see how it sounds... whenever the lap top decides to stop... whatever the hell it's doing that's consuming all the goddamn resources. God dammit, microsoft, wtf did you do with Windows 10. Leave the computer alone I'm trying to work and whatever you're doing is obviously way over the top.
FYI went 78 on audio level and talked waaay to loud so it's probably going to be garbage.
ONE UPPING AND AUDIO RECORDING:
The way to 1-up is to dump everything you have into every line you read.
When reading for extended periods of time you tend to slip into "reading out loud" mode instead of "excited, energetic conversation" mode.
Tuesday, July 26, 2016
Q3 PTC Day 17
4:45p - 7:00p
First up, review of sound checks
Sound Check Review:
Close, NO Additional dampener
The 6"-10" distance range, speaking lower and into the mic, sounds exceptionally good.
Close w/ Background dampener
May sound SLIGHTLY better than the one without the additional dampener, but hard to tell, more apparently if you get loud.
Far, NO Additional dampener
The 2' - 3' distance range, speaking louder, sounds like shit
Far, w/ Background dampener
Notably better than without the dampener, but still sounds like shit.
I was surprised how much better being close is. Even if you can't express as much, the little variations in tone convey MORE WEIGHT than the larger variations when expressing more fully from a distance. It's almost like it's more personal, more real, more powerful. And the kicker is, it takes less effort. It's like the try too hard syndrome struck again - just go up close and take it easy :).
Since there was virtually no difference with the background dampening, the good news here is I don't need to do that!
I still need to test laptop sound vs. computer sound to see how much a difference the computer makes. Just start tmw by testing right off the computer and line that up with the laptop recordings from Monday.
...
Next, I tested the Blue Yeti, curosty of Dave.
Various differences, playing with gain, pc vs. laptop, etc... all the same... it sounded pretty bad!
The lows just aren't there at all with the yeti. The result is that while it may sound slightly crisper, it carries no weight. Since the quality of my voice is in the lows, the yeti couldn't capture that quality and I sounded very flat.
...
Other tips with recording:
-As far as getting the sound just right with the mini sound studio, you'll need to pick the right distance between 6"-12" from the microphone (it seems 8-10" is the sweet spot) and test it vs. how loud you are. Both factors affect each other. It should be loud enough to feel like it's ideally expressive, but quiet enough so it's not even close to bouncing off the walls, which is the biggest killer of quality when you don't have a sound room.
-ALWAYS NOTE WHAT VOLUME LEVEL THE MICROPHONE IS SET TO WHEN TESTING!! It makes a huge difference, it's the same as "gain" dial on the mic, too much and it's all plosions.
--->WINNER = 85% volume on AT2020 (laptop)
First up, review of sound checks
Sound Check Review:
Close, NO Additional dampener
The 6"-10" distance range, speaking lower and into the mic, sounds exceptionally good.
Close w/ Background dampener
May sound SLIGHTLY better than the one without the additional dampener, but hard to tell, more apparently if you get loud.
Far, NO Additional dampener
The 2' - 3' distance range, speaking louder, sounds like shit
Far, w/ Background dampener
Notably better than without the dampener, but still sounds like shit.
I was surprised how much better being close is. Even if you can't express as much, the little variations in tone convey MORE WEIGHT than the larger variations when expressing more fully from a distance. It's almost like it's more personal, more real, more powerful. And the kicker is, it takes less effort. It's like the try too hard syndrome struck again - just go up close and take it easy :).
Since there was virtually no difference with the background dampening, the good news here is I don't need to do that!
I still need to test laptop sound vs. computer sound to see how much a difference the computer makes. Just start tmw by testing right off the computer and line that up with the laptop recordings from Monday.
...
Next, I tested the Blue Yeti, curosty of Dave.
Various differences, playing with gain, pc vs. laptop, etc... all the same... it sounded pretty bad!
The lows just aren't there at all with the yeti. The result is that while it may sound slightly crisper, it carries no weight. Since the quality of my voice is in the lows, the yeti couldn't capture that quality and I sounded very flat.
...
Other tips with recording:
-As far as getting the sound just right with the mini sound studio, you'll need to pick the right distance between 6"-12" from the microphone (it seems 8-10" is the sweet spot) and test it vs. how loud you are. Both factors affect each other. It should be loud enough to feel like it's ideally expressive, but quiet enough so it's not even close to bouncing off the walls, which is the biggest killer of quality when you don't have a sound room.
-ALWAYS NOTE WHAT VOLUME LEVEL THE MICROPHONE IS SET TO WHEN TESTING!! It makes a huge difference, it's the same as "gain" dial on the mic, too much and it's all plosions.
--->WINNER = 85% volume on AT2020 (laptop)
Labels:
audio,
audio technica,
audio-technica,
blue yeti,
editing,
microphone,
recording,
sound,
test,
testing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)